247Monitor

247Monitor vs Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is a free, open-source, self-hosted monitor — and it watches from exactly one place: your own server. If that server or its network hiccups, so does your monitoring. 247Monitor confirms outages from three continents and runs the infrastructure, so you don't have to.

Uptime Kuma is MIT-licensed, self-hosted, with 90+ notification integrations and zero per-monitor cost. For a homelab or internal services behind a firewall it has a place — your data stays yours and there's nothing to pay.

But it monitors from a single vantage point — wherever you host it — and that's the catch a hosted service exists to solve. A local network blip looks like an outage, there's no cross-region confirmation, and if your server goes down it can't tell you, because it went down with it. 247Monitor runs the infrastructure, checks from three continents, confirms failures before paging you, and adds what self-hosting can't easily give you: real-browser journeys, an SMS gateway, managed status pages and an SLA.

Side by side

The table, row by row.

Facts checked against Uptime Kuma's own pricing and documentation, June 2026. Rows where Uptime Kuma wins are marked too — comparisons you can't trust aren't comparisons.

247MonitorUptime Kuma
Cost
·Paid plans (free tier available); we run it for you
Free & open source — but you host and operate it
Who runs it
Fully managed — updates, scaling & uptime are ours
·You: provisioning, updates, security, backups
Monitoring vantage points
3 continents, cross-region confirmation before alerting
·One — wherever you host it
“Who watches the watcher?”
If a region fails, others still check & confirm
·If your server or network is down, monitoring is down too
Real-browser journeys
Included from £9 — screenshots, console logs & traces
·Not offered (no scripted Playwright journeys)
SMS & status-page hosting
SMS credits + managed, CDN-served status pages
·No built-in SMS gateway; status page self-hosted
Monitor types
HTTP, keyword, ping, port, SSL, domain expiry, DNS, heartbeat, browser & server agent
HTTP, keyword, TCP, ping, DNS, push, SSL, domain, Docker & more
Notifications
·Email, Slack, Discord, Teams, Telegram, webhooks
90+ integrations via Apprise
Team roles & billing
Teams, seats, RBAC, audit log
·Single-admin oriented; no built-in RBAC
Internal / LAN monitoring
·Public internet + inbound heartbeats
Can reach private/LAN targets directly
Support & SLA
Managed support; SLA on higher plans
·Community only — you're on-call for the monitor itself

The case for switching

Why teams pick 247Monitor over Uptime Kuma

Someone else runs the monitor

With Kuma, you own the updates, the security patches, the backups and the uptime of the monitoring box itself. With us, that's our job — including the awkward question of what monitors the monitor.

A failure gets confirmed, not assumed

A single vantage point can't tell a real outage from its own network blip. We check from three continents and confirm cross-region before we page you — the difference between a true alert and a 3am false alarm.

It can still alert when your server can't

If the box running Kuma loses power or network, it stops checking and stops alerting — silently. Our infrastructure isn't your infrastructure, so an outage on your side is exactly when we speak up.

Capabilities self-hosting can't easily add

Real-browser journeys with traces, an SMS gateway, managed status pages on a CDN, team roles and an audit log — all bundled. Reproducing those on a self-hosted stack is a project in itself.

FAQ

Switching questions

Is Uptime Kuma good enough on its own?

For homelabs and internal services, sometimes — it's free and self-hosted. But the limit is structural: it watches from one location and can't alert if its own host goes down. For anything customer-facing, monitoring from somewhere other than your own infrastructure is the whole point.

Can I run both?

Plenty of people do — Kuma for internal/LAN targets that never leave the network, 247Monitor for public-facing services that need multi-region confirmation, browser journeys, SMS and a managed status page. They complement each other neatly.

What does 247Monitor give me that self-hosting can't?

Independent vantage points with cross-region confirmation, infrastructure you don't maintain, real-browser journeys with full forensics, an SMS gateway, CDN-hosted status pages, team roles with an audit log, and support with an SLA — without you patching, backing up or babysitting the monitor.

Run both for a week. Keep the one that wakes you up correctly.

Our free plan doesn't expire, so the comparison costs you nothing but ten minutes of setup.

Start monitoring free

No credit card · 25 monitors free · 2-minute setup

Start monitoring in minutes.

Free forever for 25 monitors and a server. Add your first check, pick your alert channels, and you're live before your coffee's cold.